Compare and Contrast

Compare and Contrast is a qualitative, discussion-based approach used by teams to evaluate and prioritise opportunities by systematically discussing their relative merits, challenges, and potential impacts. Unlike quantitative scoring systems, this method emphasises dialogue and collective reasoning.

Goal

The goal is to ensure that the team focuses on the opportunities which have the highest chance of delivering the expected product outcomes.

Context

Teams have limited capacity so they need to ensure that time is being spent on the most valuable opportunities. This method is particularly useful when there are multiple opportunities to consider, and the team needs to weigh the pros and cons of each to make informed decisions.

Comaprison Techniques

The purpose of compare and contrast is that it is flexible because there is no one size fits all approach. Some of the techniques that can be used include direct comparison, criteria-based discussion, and scenario analysis.

TypeDescription
Direct ComparisonDiscussing opportunities in pairs to directly compare their strengths and weaknesses.
Criteria-based DiscussionUsing a set of predefined criteria to guide the comparison and contrast of opportunities. Examples include the RICE framework, Kano model, or other relevant criteria.
Scenario AnalysisExploring how different opportunities might play out in various future scenarios.

Inputs

ArtifactDescription
OKRs (Objectives and Key Results)The current OKRs that the team is working towards, providing a clear understanding of the desired outcomes.
OpportunitiesA comprehensive list of opportunities that the team is considering, including brief descriptions.

Outputs

ArtifactDescription
Prioritised Opportunity ListA list of opportunities ranked based on the team's discussion and analysis.

Anti-patterns

  • Dominance of Loud Voices: Allowing the opinions of a few outspoken team members to overshadow others, leading to biased outcomes.
  • Analysis Paralysis: Getting so caught up in discussion and comparison that decision-making is delayed.
  • Lack of Structure: Conducting discussions without any structure or criteria, leading to unfocused and unproductive conversations.
  • Neglecting Documentation: Failing to document the discussions and decisions, making it difficult to recall the rationale behind priorities.

Was this page helpful?

Previous
Prioritising Opportunities
© ZeroBlockers, 2024. All rights reserved.