Resource Allocation Review

Resource Allocation Reviews are a systematic evaluation process aimed at assessing whether the composition of resources, particularly human resources, within Stream teams aligns with the current and future needs of the value streams they are accountable for.

Goal

The primary goal is to ensure that each team has the right mix of skills, experience, and capacities to meet their objectives effectively, thereby maximising productivity, fostering innovation, and achieving strategic goals.

Context

People have varying skills, experiences, and interests that can be leveraged to enhance team performance and value delivery. In addition, the needs of value streams may evolve over time, requiring adjustments to team compositions. Regularly reviewing resource allocations helps ensure that teams are optimally composed to address the evolving needs of their value streams and the organisation.

Inputs

ArtifactDescription
Product StrategyOutlines the overarching goals, objectives, and priorities for the product, providing a strategic context for resource allocation decisions.
OKRsThe high-level goals and targets that the product is aiming to achieve.
Stream DashboardProvides real-time data on team performance, progress against objectives, and key metrics to inform the assessment.
Process Concepts AssessmentsExamination of awareness and buy-in for the key structures of the development process.
Research Capability AssessmentsExamination of research practices to ensure that they align with the research principles and expectations.
Design Capability AssessmentsExamination of design practices to ensure that they align with the design principles and expectations.
Development Capability AssessmentsExamination of development practices to ensure that they align with the development principles and expectations.

Outputs

ArtifactDescriptionBenefits
Stream Team CharterA document outlining the success metrics, goals, roles, relationships and rules for the Stream Team.Fosters clarity, alignment, ownership, and accountability within the team.

Anti-patterns

  • Infrequent Reviews: Waiting too long between reviews can lead to missed opportunities to address skill gaps and optimise team performance.
  • Focus on Individual Performance: The review should focus on team skills and capacity, not solely on individual performance metrics.
  • Lack of Transparency: Not involving the team in the review process can hinder communication and ownership of resource allocation decisions.
  • Inflexible Team Composition: Be open to adjusting team composition based on the assessment findings to optimise skill alignment.

Was this page helpful?

Previous
Scope and Funding Assessment
© ZeroBlockers, 2024. All rights reserved.